tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30761342.post8382120668646694207..comments2023-11-09T00:37:40.824-08:00Comments on Fosco Lives!: More Jindalicious LiesFOSCOhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07238391886095765453noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30761342.post-55604949562484155532021-08-19T01:25:19.530-07:002021-08-19T01:25:19.530-07:00Good luck & keep writing such awesome content....Good luck & keep writing such awesome content.<br /><br /><a href="www.oilin.in" rel="nofollow">Virgin Linseed Oil BP</a><br /><a href="www.oilin.in/about-us" rel="nofollow">Pure Linseed Oil </a><br /><br />Always look forward for such nice post & finally I got you. Really very impressive post & glad to read this. <br /><a href="www.simplerealestatedubai.com/AvailablePropertySaleOffPlan.aspx/" rel="nofollow"> Best Price Of Property In Dubai</a><br /><a href="www.simplerealestatedubai.com/" rel="nofollow"> Distress deal In Apartment</a><br />Drift Financial Serviceshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11875146539252208254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30761342.post-45489842409764506952021-08-19T01:25:00.374-07:002021-08-19T01:25:00.374-07:00Best content & valuable as well. Thanks for sh...Best content & valuable as well. Thanks for sharing this content.<br /><a href="www.acuvat.com/contact-us/" rel="nofollow"> Approved Auditor in DAFZA</a><br /><a href="www.acuvat.com/about-us/" rel="nofollow">Approved Auditor in RAKEZ </a><br /><a href="www.acuvat.com/contact-us" rel="nofollow"> Approved Auditor in JAFZA </a><br />i heard about this blog & get actually whatever i was finding. Nice post love to read this blog<br /><a href="www.acuvat.com/contact-us" rel="nofollow"> Approved Auditor in DMCC </a><br />Drift Financial Serviceshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11875146539252208254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30761342.post-85433299875006671142009-03-01T18:28:00.000-08:002009-03-01T18:28:00.000-08:00Finally, good luck hoping "...for a FEMA chief who...<I>Finally, good luck hoping "...for a FEMA chief who bothers to organize the Coast Guard and Air National Guard" as FEMA has jurisdiction over neither.</I><BR/><BR/>Well played, BeeMaster. I give.FOSCOhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07238391886095765453noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30761342.post-72939794620276204102009-03-01T18:06:00.000-08:002009-03-01T18:06:00.000-08:00I wasn't defending BFL (big fat liar) Governor Jin...I wasn't defending BFL (big fat liar) Governor Jindal, nor was I slamming Dan Rather (who can't be slammed any more than he already has been). I was more mocking anyone who would defend BFL Jindal based upon:<BR/><BR/>1) He's their Republican/conservative/anti-Obama guy and will defend him even though he is a BFL or<BR/><BR/>2) (the Dan Rather thing) Even though it was a BFL, it supports an underlying truth/belief (that bureaucracy is bad).<BR/><BR/>A lie is a lie, even if you like the guy or what he represents. (I had never heard of the guy before, so I don't have a dog in that fight)<BR/><BR/>If this were an impromptu utterance, you could give the guy the benefit of the doubt. But it was scripted as part of a quasi-official nationally addressed rebuttal and he should have known better. Perhaps he thought he could get away with such a <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Biden_presidential_campaign,_1988#Kinnock_controversy" REL="nofollow">Biden-esque</A> statement because the subject, Sheriff Harry Lee, has since passed away. This would only make Governor Jindal a <I><B>despicable</B></I> BFL.<BR/><BR/>What should happen to Jindal? I suppose this doesn't "rise to the level" of impeachment or anything. Unless he told the story <I><B>under oath</B></I>, of course, because THAT would be an impeachable... oh, wait. I guess not. I suppose we should all just <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MoveOn.org#History" REL="nofollow">MoveOn...</A><BR/><BR/>As for even suggesting that Bush or his administration deliberately "wouldn't" save people from drowning, you need to quit getting your current events briefings from <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanye_West#Hurricane_Katrina_fundraiser_controversy" REL="nofollow">Kanye.</A><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/earth/2315076.html?page=2" REL="nofollow">Computer simulations of a Katrina-strength hurricane had estimated a worst-case-scenario death toll of more than 60,000 people in Louisiana. The actual number was 1077 in that state.</A><BR/><BR/>Finally, good luck hoping "...for a FEMA chief who bothers to organize the Coast Guard and Air National Guard" as FEMA has jurisdiction over neither. <BR/><BR/><BR/>The BeeMasterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30761342.post-70384893611953382412009-03-01T10:39:00.000-08:002009-03-01T10:39:00.000-08:00Well, that's well and good for Dan Rather, but the...Well, that's well and good for Dan Rather, but there is still the matter of <I>Jindal's own spokesperson</I> "clarifying" that the exchange did not take place _during_ Katrina and that Sheriff Lee was not actually talking to a "bureaucrat" at the time, but rather a reporter. <BR/><BR/>Not to mention that just because GWB's government couldn't (wouldn't?) save people from drowning, that doesn't mean a different government wouldn't respond effectively and appropriately. Pretending that all government is as poorly managed and badly prepared as GWB's government is silly. In the next natural disaster, you can hope for friendly neighbors with fishing boats; instead, I'm going to hope for a FEMA chief who bothers to organize the Coast Guard and Air National Guard. <BR/><BR/>As for the suggestion that"even if the account is false, [...] the underlying story is true"--that looks to me like a textbook case of <A HREF="http://www.merriam-webster.com/info/06words.htm" REL="nofollow">truthiness</A>.FOSCOhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07238391886095765453noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30761342.post-20529007048131729752009-03-01T07:53:00.000-08:002009-03-01T07:53:00.000-08:00Peabody and Emmy award-winning journalist Dan Rat...Peabody and Emmy award-winning journalist <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rathergate#Mapes_and_Rather.27s_view_of_the_documents" REL="nofollow"> Dan Rather</A> has articulated that he believes that the account has never conclusively been proven to be false — and that even if the account is false, that the underlying story is true.<BR/><BR/>The BeeMasterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com